Meade is one of the best when it comes to reliable telescopes and they do have so many great options that you can match with what you need from the device. For those who are looking for both quality and convenient, Meade LX200 Vs LX600 are two amazing series we can consider. They are not extremely huge but great for various observations and what’s more important they do perform reliably. If you are considering getting one of them, do see what they can offer here.
In this article, we are going to give you information about:
- What to Pay Attention to in a Telescope
- What are Meade LX200 and LX600
- What Meade LX200 and LX600 Look Like
- How are the Specification of Meade LX200 and LX600
- How are the Performance of Meade LX200 and LX600
- How are the Mounting of Meade LX200 and LX600
- Meade LX200 Vs LX600
Telescope and Aperture
Our universe is still a mysterious place to us because we have been living only here on earth and we probably will never be able to unveil those that are far away from our planet. But, it doesn’t mean you can’t see them from here because our technology is already quite advanced to view those that exist too far away for our current transportation to reach. In the past, telescopes were a huge invention, but now they are just as amazing for us who are interested in astronomy.
Telescopes are probably one of the most important inventions because they can bring a further object closer to you or your eyes to actually see and observe. They are not a crucial tool that everyone has to own one yet, if you are interested to know what’s out there, having a small telescope will be a great entertainment to spend your night with. While in general all models will do the same function, there are factors that are most important for a telescope when you want to buy one.
Since they are a zooming tool, many may think that the higher their ability to zoom the better is their performance and while it sounds true, the real-life application doesn’t tell so. Just like your camera, while they are claiming to give for example 50x zooms, the image will look blurry at the end of the range and this happens as well with telescopes. What is most important in a telescope is their aperture and as you can already guess, the bigger the better applies here.
Aperture is the size or width of your telescope in the simplest term. The real job of a telescope is to gather light and the larger the telescope’s aperture or diameter of the light gathering lens/mirror, the brighter the image, the sharper the image, and the more details we can see on the objects. It is very crucial since light needs to travel so far to reach your optics and those with larger aperture also often come with greater focal length.
These models with larger focal lengths are going to magnify the image further thus, the image seen will be bigger. It also means faint objects such as nebulae and galaxies will be more visible and best when seen through telescopes with larger aperture. If you are observing planets they may need longer focal length and higher magnification too in order to see the details. Overall, the best option is always the one that fits your application the most and balancing both its performance and usability in real-life.
|Meade LX200||Meade LX600|
|Product Dimensions||22 x 115 x 29 inches||14 x 47 x 21 inches
|Shipping Weight||1 pounds||24 pounds
|Best offer||Check price||Check price|
About Meade LX200 and LX600
There are so many good options out there and you can pick any model in any price range as long as they seem to work best in your type of application. Some people may only want to see the moon or nearby planets while some may want to take pictures of nebulae, so it is best to get the product that fits in your activity. The key is on aperture itself because the bigger it is the better they can show you fine details and faint objects.
But, if you are here then it means this telescope needs to be convenient as well to be carried around because no matter how good our device is if the sky is not friendly then we can’t optimize the performance or experience which is why we also need to hunt for ideal spot and a dobsonian is not something we want to carry a lot. For this type of user, Meade has lots of Schmidt-Cassegrain models in their catalog that are not only amazing for the price but also the performance.
Meade is one of the most popular telescope brands we can rely on, similar to Celestron and what makes many of us love their products is because they are working very well and at a price point they are not very expensive too. If you prefer a telescope that can be conveniently used in your backyard or bring on a trip to find the perfect spot, Meade LX200 and LX600 are going to be two ideal models to consider for their compact system and large aperture.
As the name suggest, these two are coming from the same line hence there will be so much similarities between the two but if you are thinking what makes them difference is the aperture then it seems not completely true because the LX series has lots of different aperture in comparison but today, we are only going to talk about the 12-inch from these series and no, the 200 and 600 doesn’t refer to the size of their aperture so it often get confusing.
Meade LX200 and LX600 Design
Now let’s check out the external part of these telescopes and since it was released decades ago, the LX line doesn’t change much in fashion since they used to be with this blue tube and now they are still coming in this blue tube as well. Since the line has many series and the series itself consists of various different sizes, it can be very confusing to decide which one to pick but for this comparison we are talking about the larger 12-inch type.
While these two are not exactly compact, as they are quite heavy as well, we still think with a proper case we can put the main tube securely. They are about the same size and the short tube design makes them easy to find a box for. They are coming unassembled but you can mount them in no time and as you can see, both are also packed with the mount as well as tripod for your quick starter. Read also: Celestron Edge HD Vs Meade ACF.
Meade LX200 and LX600 Specification
Moving further let’s see what Meade LX200 and LX600 can offer because while they are pretty much similar, the fact that they are coming from different series must also affect the specification and besides being the same 12-inch type, they are carrying different focal length as the former is 3048mm compared to 2438mm means the latter is shorter and they do have different focal ratio as well at f/10 and f/8.
Similar to many of its ACF models, these two are also designed based on the idea which Meade claimed to be inspired by the classic RC. This technology is said to reduce astigmatism and eliminate diffraction spikes found in the classic RCs making the ACF models better for those who want to get the best imaging performance.
Meade LX200 and LX600 Performance
Now, let’s see the performance of these 12-inch telescopes and for the eyepiece, they are also packed with one and it is the same in both models which is the 26mm series 4000 super plossl eyepiece. As a large telescope both of them are amazing if you are only looking at planets or the moon because the detail is there, they are very bright, and overall will send you to see them closer but since the focal length is longer in LX200 series, the image of an object will also look closer in comparison.
Compared to similar models from Celestron, we do think that Meade is slightly lacking in terms of giving the best and clearest image but the gap is not huge, yet easily visible. The best thing about larger telescopes is you can see fainter objects and a 12-inch size like Meade LX200 and LX600 will be amazing for open clusters, globular clusters, and nebulae yet, for Orion they are still best seen through fairly small scopes. If you are seeing fainter and larger nebulae, these two will be very satisfying to use.
Meade LX200 and LX600 Mounting
The last part we want to mention is their mounting and as you can see both Meade LX200 and LX600 are using the same system. They are alt-azimuth mounting with a fork hand that keeps the tube stable during application. They require a few minutes to install properly for the first time and what’s best for intermediate and advanced users is they also carry 145000 total objects in the database. If you prefer equatorial we can add a wedge as well but note that the auto-slewing function is prone to failure if used often.
Meade LX200 vs LX600
These telescopes are amazing and they are ideal for those who are already experienced in using the same model. The difference is on their focal length because both of them are made with the same component and the same features including the mount and computer as well as coating and eyepiece. In comparison the image of LX200 will appear bigger than LX600, making it more ideal for smaller objects as we prefer to see a wider image for larger objects to get a complete view of it.
All in all you can pick any of them as there is no bad option between the two but if you like watching planetary nebulae, we do think the LX200 with longer focal length will be a much better option but for overall viewing, any model will deliver the same satisfaction.