Telescope performance is highly affected by the aperture and optic qualities which is why we have to be very selective when looking for the best option. But, their mounting is also important to make sure we can utilize the unit properly. CGEM II Vs EQ6 R are two amazing options for convenience and reliability because they are easy to use but also versatile for different types of users. If you are also considering these mounting, do check which can be the best choice here.
In this article, we are going to give you information about:
- What are Telescope Mount Types
- What are CGEM II and EQ6 R
- What CGEM II and EQ6 R Look Like
- What CGEM II and EQ6 R are Compatible With
- How are the Performance of CGEM II and EQ6 R
- What else CGEM II and EQ6 R can offer
- CGEM II Vs EQ6 R
Anyone with astronomy as their hobby will try to have at least one scope to help them observe the terrestrial objects conveniently from their back yard or while traveling to find a darker sky. If everything is perfect, a telescope strength is decided by their aperture since its main role is to gather light so the bigger the light gathering lens or mirror, the brighter the image will be and the clearer the image if you are looking at fainter objects.
But, sometimes what we are not really paying attention to is their mounting. Unlike a small scope that we can just hold and aim at an object, a telescope needs a mounting which is also usually installed on top of a tripod to hold all its weight and additional accessories, especially if yours are bigger with higher focal length. There are few types of mount available out there to choose from based on what you will plan to use the setup on as we will have different preferences.
|CGEM II||EQ6 R|
|Product Dimensions||9.1 x 9.1 x 9.1 inches||25 x 21 x 12 inches
|Shipping Weight||76.8 pounds||40 pounds|
|Best offer||Check price||Check price|
This is probably what the majority of people are familiar with since it is also being used in various different devices like cameras. As the name suggests, they are moving in two axes of altitude and azimuth which makes the system very easy for anyone to understand. Chances are, setting them up is very convenient but it also makes things more difficult to track objects since the movement doesn’t follow the Earth’s rotation. This is also why it is not ideal for seeking and astrophotography.
There is another similar option made for Dobsonian model which is also an Alt-azimuth but instead of installed on a tripod, its large main tube makes them have to sit on the ground itself so the long and large tube can be more stable and in general much shorter than regular AZ.
This is what most enthusiasts go for and what you will often see being offered in higher models too. Equatorial as the name suggests follow the movement of our Earth which makes everything easier when you need to track an object. It is also the best for astrophotography because you need the long exposure to capture an image. Similar to AZ, they can be added with a motor drive to counteract the effect of Earth’s rotation and make sure your telescope is focused on an object.
The drawback is this system will not be as familiar for those who just getting started and for the general public as well as more difficult to set up initially. Due to the system, they need a counterweight to balance the telescope in addition to aligning it to the celestial pole correctly to provide a precise tracking of objects.
About CGEM II and EQ6 R
Just like when buying anything, it is best to choose those that match you the best because all of us have different personal preferences that may go in details specifically about which may be the best for experience. If you are here then we assume an equatorial mount is best for the application or you already have an experience on using this system as well. For options, we can find plenty of good mounts out there from various brands and at various price ranges.
Following your gut to choose which seems to be the best choice is convenient but it is also wise to consider whether they are reliable or not in real-life. Personally we often stick to well-known names when shopping for anything because they are more trusted in quality and when it comes to good mount, we can always rely on Celestron and Sky Watcher. Both of them are huge names in the telescope market with a good reason and the reason is they make amazing products.
Celestron itself carries tons of affordable and enthusiast models like Celestron C9 25 Vs C11 in the catalog but they also have different mounts for their tube and for other brands. If you are here for a convenient yet reliable mount to improve the experience, CGEM II and EQ6 R are two amazing models from these brands. As you can guess, they are Go-To type which means added convenience and while they are not the most affordable to begin with, performance wise you can hope much from these mounts.
This type of mount is not specifying the movement but technology behind it. Our advances in computerized products are also reaching towards astronomy especially on consumer end and GoTo mount like CGEM II and EQ6 R are the option of many who are looking for best convenience whether it is for observation or for astrophotography.
CGEM II and EQ6 R Design
Just like any equatorial mounts out there, the overall design is very much similar to each other and for the load capacity, both Celestron and Sky Watcher claim that these two are capable of being used safely up to 40 and 44 lbs. Chances are you will mount a camera as well on these models which is why the high payload is necessary to consider in case your old mount is not ideal anymore. Built quality wise we do think both of them are very robust.
Side by side however, we are not sure about the dimension but it seems that EQ6 R is bulkier in comparison to CGEM II yet it is somehow lighter at 38 lbs. compared to 40 lbs. They also come with a tripod in the box but for this legs we do think a heavier steel is better just to make sure everything is solid and Celestron gave a quite good 20 lbs. stainless steel with 2-inch leg diameter, the same with Sky Watcher yet, EQ6 R is lighter than CGEM II.
CGEM II and EQ6 R Saddle Plate
Moving further, the first thing you may want to know when buying a telescope mount is making sure that it has the ideal mount for the type of dovetail saddle the main tube has. For CGEM II and EQ6 R, they are able to fit the same Vixen style dovetail so if the tube comes with this plate then we can instantly fit them together but, in addition both of them are also compatible with the D style of Losmandy which is larger in comparison since these models come with dual fit.
Having the dual system is great because it means we don’t have to worry about which mount to fit with our optical tube saddle plate and it is also versatile as we can use them with both types in case you have scopes with different mount for we don’t need to install adapter first.
CGEM II and EQ6 R Performance
On the performance, having a smooth tracking mount is probably what we are aiming for when upgrading but, worry not because both CGEM II and EQ6 R are very reliable as long as we stay in the weight capacity. The motor is very smooth and they track objects very reliably while the hand controller is very easy to use especially if you have experience with them and they are similar to most controllers in various telescopes set too, to make everything more familiar.
Their computers are packed with more than 40,000 celestial objects and both are also using 1 or 2-star aligning. They are however, not compatible with each other since they have different computers but overall they are equally convenient and easy to use. What you may want to pay attention to is when using a camera with high focal length for longer exposure because if so then you may want to look for a model with higher payload.
CGEM II and EQ6 R Features
The last part we want to mention is their features because there are some useful additional functions here too and one of them is you can directly connect their hand controller to your PC to increase convenience when upgrading firmware. In CGEM II the tripod has marking to allow quick balancing when adjusting the height while in EQ6 R, its counterweight is retractable in order to help storing or transporting more compactly. The latter also gives 22 lbs. counterweight instead of 17 lbs. from Celestron.
CGEM II Vs EQ6 R
Both of them are amazing mounts to improve your older lower payload ones. They are very impressive in performance as they work very stable and reliable but also convenient with the hand controller and some additional features. The differences are EQ6 R can hold a higher capacity and also more compact when being transported due to its retractable counterweight shaft.
They can offer mostly everything for convenience and larger tubes are no problem for them unless you also want to use a long lens on the camera. Performance wise they are great for lower weight astrophotography or observation but, we recommend to go with the cheaper one as they are equally good.